Spreadsheets, shared folders, and email threads carry academic programs surprisingly far — right up until an accreditation review, a leadership change, or one overwritten file.
Committees pass Word files back and forth, versions multiply with names like final-v3-REVISED, and nobody is certain which study plan is actually in force. The information exists — but proving it, at accreditation time, consumes months.
One system holds the authoritative version of every program, routes changes through your committees, and keeps the history. The platform is bilingual to its core, built for the structures of higher education — colleges, departments, committees — and priced per institution, not per seat.
A live demo is open to everyone — no sign-up, realistic data, every feature enabled. Walk through a program review as a committee member, browse the public catalog, and judge for yourself.
A dedicated program-lifecycle platform: one system that holds the authoritative version of every specification, routes changes through committees, tracks indicators without manual re-collection, and publishes the public catalog automatically. That is what ProgramsFlow is built for — bilingual at its core and structured around colleges, departments, and committees.
An LMS delivers teaching — courses, assignments, grades. ProgramsFlow manages the programs themselves: specifications, committee approvals, versions, accreditation evidence, and the public catalog. The two are complementary; ProgramsFlow governs what is taught and how it was approved, while the LMS runs the teaching.
The institution does not start from zero: study plans and course tables can be imported from spreadsheets, specification templates are customized to match the forms already in use, and a preset library provides ready-made templates and process types to copy and adapt. A live demo with realistic data is open before any commitment.
Dammam, Eastern Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
